The High Court disposed of WP.No.25951 of 2015 by relying on a prior order dated 01.07.2015 in WP.No.19616 of 2015 without substantive reasoning.
The writ petition is dismissed by following the order dated 01.07.2015 in WP.No.19616 of 2015. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD
FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
*********
WP.No.25951 of 2015
Between:
Md.Shakeel Ahmed and The State of Andhra Pradesh, Revenue (Stamps and Registration) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Principal Secretary and four others.
… Petitioner/Appellant (s)
… Respondent (s)
DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED: 18.08.2015
SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.25951 OF 2015
ORDER:
It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the lis in the writ petition is squarely covered by the order dated 01.07.2015, passed by this Court in WP.No.19616 of 2015 and the same is not disputed by the learned Assistant Government
Pleader for Revenue.
Recording the said submission, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the aforesaid order dated 01.07.2015 in WP.No.19616 of 2015. No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending shall stand closed.
Let a copy of the aforesaid order dated 01.07.2015 be annexed to this writ petition.
_____________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J 18.08.2015 tk
Md. Shakeel Ahmed and The State of Andhra Pradesh, Revenue (Stamps and Registration) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Principal Secretary and fou
State of Telangana
State of Andhra Pradesh
A. RAJASHEKER REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
