The petitioner abandoned the PIL and requested the court to direct the third respondent to consider his representation on merits. The court disposed of the PIL as not pressed and directed the third respondent to consider the representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
CASE No. Public Interest Litigation No. 185 of 2015
Between: Muthineni Satyanarayana, Huzur Nagar, Nalgonda District.
… Petitioner
And
The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Environment Department, Hyderabad and others.
….Respondents
DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED:
SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
1. Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see the judgments? : Yes/No
2. Whether the copies of judgment may be marked to Law Reporters/Journals? Yes/No
3. Whether Their Ladyship/Lordship wish to Yes/No see the fair copy of the judgment?
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
Public Interest Litigation No. 185 of 2015
PC: (Per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this P.I.L. and seeks direction to the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 26.3.2015.
The Public Interest Litigation is disposed of as not pressed.
The 3rd respondent shall consider the petitioner’s representation dated 26.3.2015, annexed to the petition at page-12, on merits, in accordance with law.
Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications shall also stand closed.
DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
_________________
,
J
20th July, 2015
Pnb
Muthineni Satyanarayana
The State of Telangana
Dilip B. Bhosale
S.V. Bhatt
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
