B. Thirumala Devi, v. The State of A.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE…
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
CASE No. Public Interest Litigation No. 183 of 2015
Between: B. Thirumala Devi, M.P.P., Vetapalem, Prakasam District.
… Petitioner
And
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Hyderabad and others.
….Respondents
DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED: 20.07.2015
SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
1. Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see the judgments? : Yes/No 2. Whether the copies of judgment may be marked to Law Reporters/Journals? Yes/No 3. Whether Their Ladyship/Lordship wish to Yes/No see the fair copy of the judgment?
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
Public Interest Litigation No. 183 of 2015
PC: (Per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. D. Ramesh, learned Special Government Pleader for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and Sri G. Seshadri, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of this P.I.L. with liberty to the petitioner to make representation to the District Collector, Prakasam District, for redressal of her grievance.
The Public Interest Litigation is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. If the petitioner makes representation, as aforementioned, within a period of four weeks from today, the District Collector, Prakasam District, shall consider the same on merits, in accordance with law and communicate his decision to the petitioner.
Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications shall also stand closed.
DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
_________________ S.V. BHATT, J
20th July, 2015
Pnb
B. Thirumala Devi
The State of Andhra Pradesh
Dilip B. Bhosale
S.V. Bhatt
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court