Public Interest Litigation filed by petitioner was withdrawn with liberty to approach appropriate authority. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn on 06.07.2015.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. 165 OF 2015
Date: 06.07.2015
Between: Medipalli Meghanadh. … Petitioner And The State of Telangana, rep., by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration, Hyderabad & others.
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. 165 OF 2015
PC: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Heard.
Sri P. Rama Sharana Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, prays for withdrawal of this petition with liberty to the petitioner to take appropriate remedy for redressal of his grievance.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. It is open to the petitioner to take appropriate remedy, if any, available in law, for redressal of his grievance.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed.
_________________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
________________________ S.V. BHATT, J
Date: 06.07.2015 ES
Medipalli Meghanadh
State of Telangana, rep., by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration, Hyderabad
DILIP B. BHOSALE
S.V. BHATT
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
