This is a one-line order where the Supreme Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation as withdrawn by the petitioners with liberty to approach the appropriate remedy.
Affirmed the withdrawal of the PIL with liberty to pursue appropriate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
Public Interest Litigation No.154 of 2015
DATED:29.06.2015
Between: K. Tiruvallur, Nellore District and another. … Petitioners And The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Chief Secretary, Hyderabad and others.
….Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
Public Interest Litigation No.154 of 2015
PC: (Per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of this Public Interest Litigation with liberty to the petitioners to adopt appropriate remedy for redressal of their grievance.
The Public Interest Litigation is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for.
Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications shall also stand closed.
____________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
_________________ S.V. BHATT,
J
29th June, 2015
Pnb
K. Tiruvallur
State of Andhra Pradesh
DILIP B. BHOSALE
S.V. BHATT
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
