The Public Interest Litigation filed by the petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn. The court granted liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition after collecting necessary information.
Liberty granted to the petitioner to file a fresh Public Interest Litigation after collecting necessary information.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
Public Interest Litigation No.150 of 2015
DATED:29.06.2015
Between: K. Narayana, Hyderabad.
… Petitioner
And
Election Commission of India, Represented by its Chief Election Commissioner, New Delhi and others.
….Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
Public Interest Litigation No.150 of 2015
PC: (Per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of this petition with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh Public Interest Litigation, after collecting all necessary information in support of his prayer.
The Public Interest Litigation is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for.
____________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
,
J
29th June, 2015
Pnb
K. Narayana
Election Commission of India
DILIP B. BHOSALE
S.V. BHATT
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
