Partly allowed

J. Santosh Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC29 Dec 2015CRLP/11605/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. was filed by three accused persons in relation to a criminal case at Cyberabad. The High Court heard arguments from advocates representing the petitioners and the Public Prosecutor and disposed of the matter on December 29, 2015.

What did the court decide?

CRL.P. is partly allowed, granting anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

J. Santosh Reddy Vs The State of Telangana — Anticipatory Bail | Telangana HC (2015)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

¶2

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND FIFTEEN

¶3

:PRESENT:

¶4

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE: RAJA ELANGO

¶5

CRLP .NO:11605 of 2015

¶6

Between:

¶7

1. J. Santosh Reddy, S/o Vidyasagar Reddy

¶8

2. J. Vidyasagar Reddy, S/o late Venkat Reddy

¶9

3. Smt. J. Sharada, W/o Vidyasagar Reddy

¶10

..... Petitioners/Accused Nos 1 to 3

¶11

AND

¶12

1. The State of Telangana through Public prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad

¶13

2. B. Anantha Krishna Reddy, S/o B. Anjan Reddy, R/o H.No. 11-131349/1, Margadasri Colony, Raod No.4, Kothapet, Hyderabad500035

¶14

(R2 is impleaded as per Court order dated 29-12-2015 in Crl.P.MP.No. 13267 of 2015)

¶15

.....Respondents/ Complainant

¶16

Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the memo of grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners/Accused no.1 to 3 in the event of their arrest, pending investigation and trial in Cr. No. 661/2015 of P.S. Chaitanyapuri, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District.

¶17

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the memo of grounds filed herein, and orders of High Court dated 23-11-2015 and 14-12-2015 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri M.V. Hanumantha Rao, Advocate for the Petitioners, and of Public Prosecutor (TG) for Respondent No.1, the Court made the following.

¶18

ORDER

¶19

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶20

//TRUE COPY//

¶21

For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶22

¶23

1. The XI Metropolitan Magistrate, at L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad

¶24

2. The S.H.O., Chaitanyapuri Police Station, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District

¶25

3. B. Anantha Krishna Reddy, S/o B. Anjan Reddy, R/o H.No. 1113-1349/1, Margadasri Colony, Raod No.4, Kothapet, Hyderabad500035

¶26

4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor (TG), High Court, Hyderabad

¶27

(OUT)

¶28

5. One CC to Sri M.V. Hanumantha Rao, Advocate (OPUC)

¶29

6. One spare copy

Skm

HIGH COURT

RE,J

Drafted by: skm Drafted on: 5-1-2016

¶34

DATE: 29-12-2015

¶35

ORDER

¶36

CRL.P.NO. 11605 OF 2015

¶37

ACCORDINGLY, CRL.P. IS PARTLY ALLOWED

J. Santosh Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

J. Santosh Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chitturi Marimma, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Gajjelli Mallamma , mallu Vs State of Andhra PRadesh

B.Reddapa Reddy, Vs The District Collector

Chelcuri Venkatapathi Raju Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Nakkala Chinna Kondalu Vs The District Collector

Rudraraju Sivaprasad Varma Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary