Disposed

Gajjelli Mallamma , mallu v. State of Andhra PRadesh

Telangana HC28 Dec 2015WP/12546/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging the failure to take action against land transfer under the Andhra Pradesh Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977. The Court did not adjudicate merits but directed the District Collector to dispose of the petitioner's representation within 12 weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.2 to dispose of the representation dated 12.04.2012 within 12 weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

Gajjelli Mallamma , mallu Vs State of Andhra PRadesh — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2015)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR

¶2

WRIT PETITION No.12546 OF 2012

¶3

ORDER:

¶4

Heard Sri S.Sharath Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing on behalf of respondents 1 to 4 and Sri Venkat Reddy Donthi Reddy, learned counsel for respondents 5 and 6 and with their consent the writ petition is disposed of.

¶5

2. The present writ petition came to be filed seeking issuance of writ of mandamus declaring the action of respondents 2 to 4 in not taking action against respondents 5 to 7 under the provisions of Andhra Pradesh Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977, on the basis of the complaint petitions submitted by the petitioner to respondents 2 to 4 and further to declare the documents bearing Nos.991/1974, 992/1974 and 993/1974, dated 01.10.1974, registered with the Sub-Registrar, Macherial, as wholly arbitrary and illegal and consequently, direct respondents 2 to 4 to immediately initiate proceedings under the provisions of Andhra Pradesh Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977, and evict the respondents 5 to 7 from the property admeasuring Ac.14.08 Gts., of dry land in Sy.No.102 at Naspur Grampanchayat, Mancherial Mandal, Adilabad District.

¶6

3. Though various grounds are raised in the writ petition, learned counsel for the petitioner restricts his prayer seeking a direction to the respondents to dispose of the representation, dated 12.04.2012, made by the petitioner at the earliest.

¶7

4. Learned Government Pleader for Revenue submits that the

¶8

same may be directed to be disposed of.

¶9

5. Without going into the merits and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondent No.2-District Collector, Adilabad District, to dispose of the representation, dated 12.04.2012, in accordance with law, as early as possible preferably within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order.

¶10

Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶11

_______________________ JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR

¶12

Date:28.12.2015 INL

Gajjelli Mallamma , mallu v. State of Andhra PRadesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gajjelli Mallamma , mallu v. State of Andhra PRadesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. M. Kalavathi w/o Padma Rao, Vs The State of A.P.

Panaganti Chandramma Vs Panaganti Venkati

M/s.New Visakha Shipping Logistics Vs The Commissioner of Customs

Budda Apparao, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh

K.S.R. Raju (Seetharamaraju Kalidendi) Vs The Chief Regional Manager

Chitturi Marimma, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh