This court dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on the day it was listed for dismissal.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
100
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI
WRIT PETITION No.9823 of 2009
Date : 21.10.2014
grk
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI WRIT PETITION No.9823 of 2009
O R D E R:
When this writ petition was called on 18.10.2014, in view of absence of any representation on behalf of the petitioner, this Court directed the matter to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’ on 21.10.2014. i.e., today. Today, when the matter was called in the prelunch session, none appeared for the petitioner, as such, this Court passed over the matter and when the matter is taken up now in the postlunch session, none appears for the petitioner. This indicates that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting the writ petition.
For the aforesaid reasons, writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand dismissed. No order as to costs.
_______________ A.V.SESHA SAI, J
Date:21.10.2014 grk
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI WRIT PETITION No.9823 of 2009
Date : 21-10-2014
Between: M.Siva Kumar, S/o Pochaiah, Aged about 47 years, Senior Assistant, Sri Lakshmi Narasimha Swamy Vari Devasthanam, Yadagirutta, Nalgonda District.
… Petitioner
and The Manager (P &GS), P & GS Unit, Lif
… Respondents
M.Siva Kumar
The Manager (P &GS), P & GS Unit, Lif
A.V.Sesha Sai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
