The Apex Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous, thereby terminating the cause of action without adjudicating the merits or granting specific relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V. SESHA SAI
W.P.No.15768 of 2009
Between:
Pondur Mandal Mahila Mutually Aided Cooperative Federation Ltd., Pondur, rep. by its President, K. Ranjitha
PETITIONER
AND
1. The Project Director, District Rural Development Agency (DRDA), & Indira kranthipadam (IKP), Srikakulam, and others.
RESPONDENTS
ORDER:
It is submitted by Sri B.M. Patro, learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
_______________________ JUSTICE A.V. SESHA SAI.
18th October, 2014 Js.
Pondur Mandal Mahila Mutually Aided Cooperative Federation Ltd. Pondur
The Project Director District Rural Development Agency DRDA
A.V. SESA SAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
