Writ Petition dismissed for nonprosecution as the petitioner failed to appear before the Court for two consecutive hearings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI
W.P.No.30073 of 2010
ORDER:
When the matter was called on 13.10.2014, in view of absence of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court directed the matter to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’ on 14.10.2014. Today, when the matter is called in the pre-lunch session, none appeared for the petitioner and once again the matter is called in the post-lunch session, still there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. This indicates that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting the matter.
For the foregoing reasons, the Writ Petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
______________ A.V.SESHA SAI, J
Date: 14.10.2014 DA
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI
W.P.No.30073 of 2010
14.10.2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI
W.P.No.30073 of 2010
Date: 14.10.2014
Between:
A.L.Sudershan Construction Company Ltd., represented by A.L. Sudershan, Managing Director, Secunderabad.
.. Petitioner
And
Union of India, rep. by Chief Engineer (Southern Command), Military Engineer Services, Headquarters, Pune and another.
.. Respondents
A.L.Sudershan Construction Company Ltd.
Union of India
A.V.SESHA SAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
