Disposed

Nasina Mounika, D/o. Late Srininvasulu, v. The State Government of Andhra Pradesh rep.

Telangana HC18 Oct 2014WP/24199/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of a writ petition seeking a direction to issue management quota admission application forms for medical courses. The Court held that since interim orders mandated form issuance, the form was issued but the petitioner did not appear, leaving nothing to adjudicate.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition stands disposed of as the interim order to issue application form has been complied with.

Nasina Mounika, D/o. Late Srininvasulu, Vs The… — Education and Admissions | Telangana HC (2014)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY

¶2

W.P.NO.24199 OF 2014

¶3

O R D E R :

¶4

This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondents 4 and 5 in refusing to issue Application Form to the petitioner for admission into Management Quota Seats (Category-C(1) in Under-Graduate Medical and Dental Courses for the Academic Year 2014-15, either through their website or in person, as required by the Rules framed under G.O.Ms.No.136 (Health, Medical and Family Welfare(E1) Department, dated 30.04.2007, as amended by G.O.Ms.No.97 (Health, Medical and Family Welfare (E1), Department, dated 06.07.2013 issued by the respondent No.1, as illegal and for a consequential direction to the respondents 4 and 5 to issue Application Forms to the petitioner for admission into Management Quota Seats (Category-C(1) in Under-Graduate Medical and Dental Courses for the academic year 2014-15 and for further direction to the respondents 4 and 5 to receive the completed Application Form and issue receipt.

¶5

When the matter came up for admission, this Court passed interim orders on 26.08.2014 granting interim direction to issue application form and receive the same.

¶6

Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the counsel for the 5^th respondent submitted that in pursuance of the interim orders passed on 26.08.2014 application is issued to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the 5^th respondent submitted that after issuance of application, the petitioner did not turn up.

¶7

Since the interim order is complied with and the Application Form is issued to the petitioner, nothing survives in the Writ Petition.

¶8

In view of the above, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶9

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition, shall stand closed.

¶10

_______________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J 18.10.2014 kvrm

¶11

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY

¶12

W.P.NO.24199 OF 2014

¶13

DATE: 18.10.2014

¶14

kvrm

Nasina Mounika, D/o. Late Srininvasulu, v. The State Government of Andhra Pradesh rep.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nasina Mounika, D/o. Late Srininvasulu, v. The State Government of Andhra Pradesh rep.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kammili Satyanayarana Raju Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Syed Habeeb Vs M.Laxmipathy Raju

M/s.a.P.Steels Ltd.(In Liqn.) Vs -

Syed Jameel Mohiuddin Vs R.a.Dayanand

Duvvuru Pulla Reddy, S/o. Duvvuru Subba Reddy, Vs The State Government of Andhra Pradesh rep.

M.Pulla Reddy, Vs P.Ram Reddy