The High Court held that the writ petition has become infructuous and does not survive for adjudication. Consequently, the petition was dismissed with no order as to costs and related miscellaneous petitions were closed.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous petitions closed. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V. SESHA SAI
W.P.No.21822 of 2005
Between:
Ms. J. Kasturi Bayamma
PETITIONER
AND
1. The Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., rep. by its Chief Divisional Manager, Secunderabad Division, Himayatnagar, Hyderabad, and others.
RESPONDENTS
ORDER:
It is represented by Sri M. Ravindranath Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
_______________________ JUSTICE A.V. SESHA SAI.
15th October, 2014 Js.
Ms. J. Kasturi Bayamma
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
A.V. Seshasai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
