The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner and counsel did not appear on the day of hearing. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.17295 of 2010
ORDER:
When the matter was listed on 28.11.2014, learned Counsel for the petitioner was absent. Today also when the matter is called, none appeared for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the petitioner is absent.
The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed for non-prosecution. The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
________________________________ (A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO, J)
11.12.2014 vs
A. Ramalingeswara Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
