The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous because the cause does not survive for adjudication.
No order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions stood closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No.14655 of 2008
ORDER:
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in this writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the writ petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed.
_________________________ A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO J Date: 05.12.2014 siva
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO
W.P.No.14655 of 2008
Date: 05.12.2014
siva
Petitioner
Respondent
A. Ramalingeswara Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
