The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the learned counsel for the petitioner was absent on the date of hearing, with no representation provided at the subsequent hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.11335 of 2008
O R D E R:
On 24.11.2014 when the case was called, learned counsel for the petitioner was absent and the matter was directed to be listed on 01.12.2014 under the caption ‘for orders’. Today also when the case is called, there is no representation for the petitioner.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand dismissed in consequence. No costs.
________________________________ A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO, J Date: December 01, 2014 BSB
40 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.11335 of 2008
Date: December 01, 2014
BSB
A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
