Dismissed

The State of Ap v. Rajendra Rice Industries

Telangana HC5 Feb 2014TREVC/187/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This common order dismissed tax revisions challenging orders of remand passed by the Andhra Pradesh Sales Tax & VAT Appellate Tribunal. The court deferred interference pending the Supreme Court's consideration of a related case and advised petitioners to file SLPs.

What did the court decide?

The revision cases are dismissed. Petitioners are advised to file SLPs in the Supreme Court as the related SLP is pending. Miscellaneous petitions stood closed.

The State of Ap Vs Rajendra Rice Industries — Income Tax | Telangana HC (2014)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

¶2

TAX REVISION CASE Nos. 182, 183, 184 and 187 of 2013

¶3

COMMON ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Ashutosh Mohunta)

¶4

As the issue involved in all these Revisions is one and the same, they are heard together and being disposed of by this common order.

¶5

The petitioner in all these matters is challenging the order passed by the Andhra Pradesh Sales Tax & VAT Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad, in various appeals, vide which, the assessment orders passed against the respondents have been set aside.

¶6

Learned Special Standing Counsel for Commercial Tax submits that in similar matter, the Government has filed Special Leave Petition against the order in TREVC No.63 of 2013 passed by this Court on 11.07.2013 and the same is pending consideration before the Supreme Court.

¶7

As stated by the learned Counsel that the issue involved in these revision cases is covered by the decision in The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by the State Representative before STAT, Hyderabad Vs. M/s Madhavi Industries, Karimnagar^[1] , which is reproduced as under :

¶8

“Having heard the learned Lawyer for the petitioner and having perused the impugned judgment and order, we are not inclined to interfere with the same at this stage, as it is simply an order of remand for taking fresh

¶9

decision by the lower authority. We direct the lower authority to decide the matter as early as possible, preferably within three months from the date of communication of this order.

¶10

The revision is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs.”

¶11

As the aforesaid TREVC No.63 of 2013 was dismissed on 11.07.2013 being merely a remanded order, the present revision cases are also dismissed in terms thereof. However, as the State has already filed SLP against the order passed in similar matter i.e., in TREVC No.63 of 2013 before the Supreme Court, which is pending consideration, we are of the considered opinion that the petitioner, if so advised may file SLPs in the present revision cases also. No costs.

¶12

Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶13

__________________________________ JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA.

¶14

JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY.

¶15

Date : 05.02.2014 gvl

¶16

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA AND

¶17

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

¶18

TAX REVISION CASE Nos. 182, 183, 184 and 187 of 2013

¶19

Date : 05.02.2014

¶20

Gvl

¶21

[1] TREVC No.63 of 2013

The State of Ap v. Rajendra Rice Industries

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The State of Ap v. Rajendra Rice Industries

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt.Vundavalli Surya Satyanarayanamma, Vs A.P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

M/s R S Molecules Private Limited, Vs The Union Of India

The State of Andhra Pradesh Vs M/s. Sri Laxmi Boiled Modern Rice Mill

The State of Ap Vs Voltas Ltd.

M/s. Chandrima Traders, Vs Authorized Office

The State of Andhra Pradesh Vs M/s Chida Spinning Mills (P) Ltd.