“To issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action waiving of Debt of Farmers by Respondents 1 and 2 is unconstitutional, arbitrary, discriminatory, illegal, a corrupt practice done with malafide and egoistic intention, against interest of food security of nation, discouraging, ignoring (though wrongly used the word ‘disincentivesing’) small, marginal, tenant farmers with implied tenancy, and youngsters not having own farmland, to take up agriculture as livelihood, is violative of Article 282 to be read with Underserved want concept of Article 41, violative of Articles 14, 19(g), 21, 39(a)(b)(c), 41, 48A, violative of Environmental (Protection) Act, 1986 to be read with Citizenship Act 1955, violative of AP FRBM Act 2005, violative of Andhra Pradesh Tenancy Act, 1956 (Andhra Region), violative of Andhra Pradesh Tenancy (Telangana) and Agricultural Act, 1950, violative of Article 21, 39(a)(b)(c), 41 of Citizens of Posterity, violative of principles of Intergenerational equity and natural justice, in the interest of justice and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”
