Allowed

Mr. B. Praveen Kumar v. Smt. Swapna

Telangana HC12 Jun 2014FCA/200/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an appeal against a decree dismissing a divorce petition, the Court, upon parties appearing and consenting to a Memorandum of Compromise, allowed the appeal, set aside the original decree, and granted a divorce dissolving the marriage based on the settlement.

What did the court decide?

F.C.A.M.P.No.582 of 2013 allowed; F.C.A.No.200 of 2013 disposed of; impugned order and decree set aside; original petition allowed; marriage dissolved per Memorandum of Compromise.

Mr. B. Praveen Kumar Vs Smt. Swapna — Matrimonial and Divorce | Telangana HC (2014)

¶1

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.SHANKAR NARAYANA

¶2

F.C.A.M.P.No.582 of 2013 in/and F.C.A.No.200 of 2013

¶3

JUDGMENT : (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R.Subhash Reddy)

¶4

F.C.A.No.200 of 2013, under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, is filed by the appellant/husband aggrieved by the order and decree dated 01.03.2013 in O.P.No.240 of 2009 passed by the Family Court, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar, Hyderabad, dismissing the petition filed by him under Section 13(1) (ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for brevity “the Act”), seeking to grant a decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage performed on 09.10.2003 between him and the respondent/wife.

¶5

2. During the pendency of the appeal, both the parties have filed a petition being F.C.A.M.P.No.582 of 2013 under Order 23 Rule 3 of C.P.C., seeking to allow the appeal in terms of Memorandum of Compromise dated 29.09.2013, which was signed by both the parties along with their advocates, wherein it is stated that they have decided to seek dissolution of marriage between them in terms of the Memorandum of Compromise.

¶6

3. When the matter is called, both the parties are present before this Court along with their advocates, who identified the respective parties, and requested to dispose of

¶7

the appeal in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties and grant a decree of divorce dissolving the marriage between the parties in terms of the Memorandum of Compromise dated 29.09.2013.

¶8

4. In view of the above and having regard to the settlement arrived at between the parties, we deem it appropriate to dispose of the appeal in terms of the Memorandum of Compromise dated 29.09.2013.

¶9

5. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties pursuant to the Memorandum of Compromise dated 29.09.2013, F.C.A.M.P.No.582 of 2013 is allowed. Consequently, F.C.A.No.200 of 2013 is disposed of, setting aside the impugned order and decree dated 01.03.2013. Consequently, O.P.No.240 of 2009 stands allowed and the marriage between appellant and respondent stands dissolved. The terms of Memorandum of Compromise dated 29.09.2013 shall form part of decree.

¶10

6. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand closed. No order as to costs.

¶11

____________________________ JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY

¶12

________________________________ JUSTICE A.SHANKAR NARAYANA 12.06.2014.

¶13

Msr

¶14

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.SHANKAR NARAYANA

¶15

F.C.A.M.P.No.582 of 2013 in/and F.C.A.No.200 of 2013

¶16

12.06.2014

¶17

Msr

Mr. B. Praveen Kumar v. Smt. Swapna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr. B. Praveen Kumar v. Smt. Swapna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Neil Anthony Hessing Vs Andria MEcheal

Mohd. Abdul Khader Qureshi , Afsar Vs Ms. Bee Pasha , Raheemunnisa Begum

Mr. S.G. Nagenderlal Vs Smt. S.N. Sangeera Bai

B. Shanker Vs Smt Tara Bai , Sujata

P.Samuel Vs Smt. P.Padma , K.Padma

P.Naga Rathana Rao Vs P.Hema Bindu