Allowed

P.Narsimha Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Telangana HC28 Apr 2014CRLP/4370/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

An 86-year-old former MLA approached the High Court for anticipatory bail in connection with offences under Sections 406, 419, and 468 IPC. Considering his age and the nature of offences, the court granted anticipatory bail subject to surrender within two weeks and execution of a bond.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC subject to surrender within two weeks and bond execution.

P.Narsimha Reddy Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh — Cheating and Forgery | Telangana HC (2014)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY , THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND FOURTEEN

¶2

:PRESENT:

¶3

THE HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR CRLP .NO:4370 of 2014

¶4

Between:

¶5

P.Narsimha Reddy S/o Late P.Laxma Reddy,

¶6

..... Petitioner/ Accused- 3

¶7

AND

¶8

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High court of A.P., Hyderabad.

¶9

.....Respondent/ Complainant

¶10

Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the petition and the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Station House Officer, CCS, Nampally, Hyderabad to release the petitioner on. ball in the event of his arrest in connection with the Crime No.58/2014 of CCS, Nampally, Hyderabad and pass such other order or orders as this Honourable court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case..

¶11

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the Memo of grounds filed herein, and upon hearing the arguments of SRI D. KODANDARAMI REDDY Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor, for the Respondent, the Court made the following.

¶12

ORDER:-

¶13

The petitioner is A-3. He seeks for grant of anticipatory bail. He allegedly committed offences under Sections 406, 419 and 468 IPC.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner did not commit any of the offences levelled against him.

¶15

The petitioner is 86 years old. He is a former M.L.A.

¶16

In view of the age of the petitioner and the nature of the offences alleged against him, I consider it appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail.

¶17

Consequently, this Criminal Petition is allowed. The petitionerA3 shall surrender before the II Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad, within two (2) weeks from today. On such surrender, the learned II Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad, shall enlarge the petitioner-A3 on bail on a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each in a likesum to his satisfaction.

¶18

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶19

To:1. The II Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad. 2. The Station House Officer, CCS, Nampally, Hyderabad. 3. Two C.Cs. to Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Hyderabad. (OUT). 4. One C.c. to Sri d. Kodandarami Reddy Advocate (OPUC). 5. One spare copy. Ags

¶20

AGS Dt: 29/04/2014.

¶21

HIGH COURT

¶22

Dr. KG S J Dt: 28/04/2014

¶23

ORDER:-

¶24

CRLP .NO:4370 of 2014

¶25

BAIL

P.Narsimha Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Narsimha Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.Narsimha Reddy Vs Balwanth Singh

P.Khader Bee and Another Vs P.Babamma and Another

Chandrakanth (minor) Vs Gunda Vithal

Devanandule Rajeswar Rao Vs Devanandule Veena Devi

Kure Ramachandrappa Vs The State of A.P.

Bhusarapu Pullamma(died) per Lr A-2 Vs Edupalli Pydamma(died) per Lr RR-2 to 5