Chandrakanth (minor) v. Gunda Vithal
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as neither party appeared despite listing, with pending miscellaneous petitions dismissed in consequence. No order as to costs.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as neither party appeared despite listing, with pending miscellaneous petitions dismissed in consequence. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
A.S.No. 788 OF 1995
JUDGMENT:
None represented both the appellant and the respondent though the matter is listed under the caption 'For Dismissal'. Hence, the appeal is liable to be dismissed for non-prosecution.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending miscellaneous petitions in this appeal, if any, shall stand dismissed in consequence. No order as to costs.
M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J. Date: 21-04-2014. JSK
M.Satyanaarayana Murthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court