Allowed

Kure Ramachandrappa v. The State of A.P.

Telangana HC28 Apr 2014CRLP/4065/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Andhra Pradesh granted anticipatory bail to senior citizen petitioner Kure Ramachandrappa and female petitioner Kure Nagalakshmi accused of offences under IPC Sections 498-A, 420, 323, 324, 506, and 509, directing surrender to Judicial Magistrate Nandyal within two weeks on personal bond of Rs. 10,000.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail enlarged on personal bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties in likesum; surrender directed before Judicial Magistrate Nandyal within two weeks.

Kure Ramachandrappa Vs The State of A.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Telangana HC (2014)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD

¶2

MONDAY , THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND FOURTEEN :PRESENT:

¶3

THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR

¶4

CRLP .NO:4065 of 2014

¶5

Between:

¶6

1 Kure Ramachandrappa S/o. Ramachandrappa,

¶7

2 Kure Nagalakshmi W/o. Ramachandrappa,

¶8

..... Petitioners/Accused Nos. 2 & 3

¶9

AND

¶10

The State of A.P., rept. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad, through SHO, Mahanandi PS., Mahanandi, Kurnool District.

¶11

.....Respondent/Complainant

¶12

Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the petition and the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No. 37 of 2013 on the file of the Mahanandi Police Station, Kurnool, Kurnool District.

¶13

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the Memo of grounds filed herein, and upon hearing the arguments of SRI N. ASWARTHA NARAYANA, Advocate for the Petitioners and of the Public Prosecutor, for the Respondent, the Court made the following

¶14

ORDER

¶15

Petitioners are A2 and A3. They seek for grant of anticipatory bail. They allegedly committed offences under Section 498-A IPC and also offences under Sections 420, 323, 324, 506 and 509 IPC. The first petitioner is a senior citizen. The second petitioner is a woman. In view of the age of the first petitioner and sex of the second petitioner and also in view of the nature of the offences involved, I consider it appropriate to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail.

¶16

Consequently, this Criminal Petition is allowed. Petitioners shall surrender before the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nandyal, within two weeks from today. On such surrender, the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nandyal, shall enlarge the petitioners on bail on a personal bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties each in a likesum to his satisfaction.

¶17

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶18

//TRUE COPY//

¶19

For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶20

¶21

1. The Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nandyal, Kurnool District.

¶22

2. The Station House Officer, Police Station, Mahanandi, Kurnool District.

¶23

3. Two CC’s to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. (OUT)

¶24

4. One CC to SRI N. ASWARTHA NARAYANA, Advocate (OPUC)

¶25

5. One spare copy.

BRT

HIGH COURT

DR KGSJ

DATED:28-4-2014

ORDER:

CRL.P.NO.4065 OF 2014

¶32

BAIL

¶33

HIGH COURT

¶34

BRT DRAFTED ON: 29-4-2014 DR KGSJ

¶35

DATED:28-4-2014

¶36

ORDER:

¶37

CRL.P.NO.4065 OF 2014

¶38

BAIL

Kure Ramachandrappa v. The State of A.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kure Ramachandrappa v. The State of A.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.Narsimha Reddy Vs Balwanth Singh

P.Khader Bee and Another Vs P.Babamma and Another

Chandrakanth (minor) Vs Gunda Vithal

P.Narsimha Reddy Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Devanandule Rajeswar Rao Vs Devanandule Veena Devi

Bhusarapu Pullamma(died) per Lr A-2 Vs Edupalli Pydamma(died) per Lr RR-2 to 5