This is an order sheet for Cr.P. No. 10800 of 2014 where petitioners sought regular bail under Sections 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C. The document records the hearing date, advocates, and transmission details but does not contain the final decision or reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOURTEEN
:PRESENT:
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO
CRL.P. NO:10800 of 2014
Between:
1 Murikunta Lakshman S/o. Bannes (late)
..... Petitioners/Accused No.1 & 2
AND
The State of AP., rept. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.
.....Respondent
Petition under Sections 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the stated in the petition and the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to grant regular bail to the petitioners in connection with Crime in PR. No. 67 of 2014-15 of Prohibition and Excise Station, Chirala, in the interest of justice..
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Praveen Kumar Veerjala, Advocate for the Petitioners and of the Addl. Public Prosecutor, for the Respondent, the Court made the following.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To
1. The Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Chirala, Prakasam District
2. The Inspector, Prohibition and Excise Station, Chirala, Prakasam District
3. The Superintendent, District Jail, Ongole, Prakasam District
4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, (AP) High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT)
5. One CC to Sri Praveen Kumar Veerjala, Advocate (OPUC)
6. One Spare Copy
HIGH COURT
DR.SSRBJ
DATE: 11-9-2014
ORDER
CRL.P. NO. 10800 OF 2014
BAIL
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the accused in the present criminal proceedings.
"In the interest of justice" argument for granting regular bail.
Murikunta Lakshman S/o. Bannes (late)
Komati Chinnaiah S/o. Bojjaiah
The State of AP.
Dr. Justice B. Siva Sankara Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
