Disposed
P. Raviprakash, v. The State of A.P.
Telangana HCCRLP/10425/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
FRIDAY , THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOURTEEN
:PRESENT:
THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO
CRLP .NO:10425 of 2014
Between:
Accused Nos. 2 to 6 AND
The State of A.P., Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad.
.....Respondent/
Respondent
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the petition and the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to release the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in connection with Cr.No.57 of 2013 on the file of the Allagadda Police Station, Allagadda, Kurnool District.
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the grounds filed herein, and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N. ASWARTHA NARAYANA Advocate for the Petitioner and Public Prosecutor, for the Respondent , the Court made the following.
ORDER:
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To:-
1. The Station House Officer, Allagadda Police Station, Allagadda, Kurnool District.
2. One C.C. to Sri N. ASWARTHA NARAYANA Advocate (OPUC). 3. Two C.Cs. to Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Hyderabad (OUT).
4. One spare copy.
Ags Dt: 15/09/2014.
HIGH COURT
SSRB J Dt: 12/09/2014
ORDER:CRLP. NO. 10425 OF 2014
BAIL
P. Raviprakash
P. Gangi Reddy
P. Balamma
Neeli Lakshmidevi
Neeli Nageswararao
The State of A.P.
B. SIVA SANKARA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court