The appellant did not appear when the matter was listed on 05.02.2014 or again on 10.02.2014. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 4015 of 2003 was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.4015 OF 2003
JUDGMENT: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice R. Subhash Reddy)
When the matter came up on 05.02.2014, as none appeared for the appellant, it was ordered to be posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today, when the matter has come up, none appears for the appellant and there is no representation on her behalf.
Therefore, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, shall stand closed. No costs.
____________________________ JUSTICE R.SUBHASH
REDDY
JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA
10th February, 2014 MD
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.4015 OF 2003
(Per Hon'ble Sri Justice R.Subhash Reddy)
10th February, 2014
MD
R. SUBHASH REDDY
A. SHANKAR NARAYANA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
