The appellate court recorded that a settlement was reached by parties during pendency and dismissed the civil miscellaneous appeal as infructuous without costs.
Appeal dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous petitions closed if any; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.3979 OF 2003
JUDGMENT: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice R. Subhash Reddy)
It is represented by the learned counsel appearing for appellant that during pendency of the appeal, there was settlement between the parties and they are staying together and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in this appeal.
Recording the same, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, shall stand closed. No costs.
____________________________ JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY
JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA 10th February, 2014 MD
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.3979 OF 2003
(Per Hon'ble Sri Justice R.Subhash Reddy)
10th February, 2014
MD
R. Subhash Reddy
A. Shankar Narayana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
