Dismissed
Mukkamalla Venkateshwara Reddy, v. Sri Ch. Nagabushanam
Telangana HCCC/1163/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Contempt…
What the court decided
AI extract
SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Contempt…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
Contempt Case No.1163 of 2014
Dated 1 2 th September, 2014
Between:
Mukkamalla Venkateshwara Reddy
…Petitioner And
Ch.Nagabhushanam
…Respondent
Counsel for the petitioner: Sri P.Laxma Reddy
Counsel for the respondent: Special Govt.Pleader (AP)
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This contempt case is filed alleging wilful disobedience of order, dated 04.11.2013, in W.P.No.12537 of 2013.
By the above-mentioned order, this Court has directed the respondent herein to consider the petitioner’s request for mutation of his name in the record of rights in the light of the report, dated 04.08.2010, of the Mandal Revenue Inspector, Markapur.
This Court has admitted the case and directed the respondent to present himself personally. Accordingly, he is personally present. The learned Government Pleader representing him placed before the Court a copy of the proceedings in Rc.B.129/2014, dated 11.08.2014, of the respondent, whereby he has rejected the petitioner’s request for mutation of his name in the record of rights.
Though the respondent has not complied with the order of this Court within the time stipulated by this Court, considering the explanation offered by the learned Special Government Pleader (AP) for the delay, the contempt case is closed with liberty to the petitioner
to avail appropriate remedy to question the order passed by the respondent, if he feels aggrieved thereby.
The respondent is discharged from the contempt proceedings. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J
12th September, 2014 VGB
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be held in contempt for failure to comply with the court’s order dated 04.11.2013 directed to admit suit.
Mukkamalla Venkateshwara Reddy
Ch.Nagabhushanam
C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court