An appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellants failed to represent the matter on two consecutive listings. All pending miscellaneous petitions were closed.
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution; pending miscellaneous petitions were closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.SHANKAR NARAYANA
APPEAL SUIT No.490 of 1999
JUDGMENT : (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R.Subhash Reddy)
As there was no representation for the appellants on 09.06.2014, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption “FOR DISMISSAL”.
2. Even today, despite the matter being listed under the caption “FOR DISMISSAL”, when the matter is called, there is no representation for the appellants.
3. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.
____________________________ JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY
JUSTICE A.SHANKAR NARAYANA
16.06.2014. Msr
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.SHANKAR NARAYANA
APPEAL SUIT No.490 of 1999
16.06.2014 Msr
R.SUBHASH REDDY
A.SHANKAR NARAYANA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
