- v. -
Case brief
What is this about?
This writ petition was dismissed as not maintainable because a Common Judgment from December 31, 2012, already covered the grievance regarding land registration. The petitioner was granted liberty to approach the respondent for implementation of the earlier judgment.
What did the court decide?
Liberty to approach respondent No.2 for implementation of Common Judgment dated 31-12-2012.
What the court decided
The Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy
Writ Petition No.4797 of 2013
Dated 18.02.2013
Between:
Arashetti Nagaswaramma
…Petitioner
And
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Registration & Stamps) dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad & 2 others
…Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner: Mrs.Shahina Khan for Mrs.M.Bhaskara Lakshmi
Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Revenue
The Court made the following:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a fresh writ petition is maintainable when a Common Judgment in a batch already covers the grievance.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Arashetti Nagaswaramma
- respondent
The State of Andhra Pradesh
Coram
C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/4797/2013
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court