Dismissed

Sutapalli Gunneshwara Rao, S/o.S.Narsingh Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Telangana HC12 Dec 2013WP/36404/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order disposes of a writ petition against registration authorities refusing to receive documents for a specific property. The court directs the Sub-Registrar to proceed with registration if statutory requirements are met, relying on prior judgments affirming the petitioner's claim to the land.

What did the court decide?

Directing the Sub-Registrar to receive, process, and complete registration formalities for the petitioner's document regarding the subject land if it fulfils legal requirements under the Registration

Sutapalli Gunneshwara Rao, S/o.S.Narsingh Rao Vs The… — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2013)

¶1

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.36404 OF 2013

¶2

Date: 12.12.2013

¶3

Between : Sutapalli Gunneshwara Rao

¶4

… Petitioner

¶5

and The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Registration and Stamps (Revenue) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others … Respondents

¶6

The Court made the following:

¶7

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.36404 OF 2013

¶8

ORDER:

¶9

The petitioner assails the action of the registration authorities in refusing to receive the documents presented by him in respect of the property bearing D.No.9-2-28 B, admeasuring 32 square yards in Survey No.159/2 part, Telaga Panda Vidhi, Old Ward No.4, New Ward No.3, Salur Village and Municipality, Vizianagaram District. According to the petitioner, the Sub-Registrar informed him that documents pertaining to the subject land are prohibited for registration and furnished a list of prohibited properties, which included Survey No.159/2 of Salur.

¶10

2. The land in this survey number fell for consideration before this Court in W.P. No.23634 of 2012. A copy of the order, dated 26.11.2012, passed therein is placed on record and reflects that part of the subject land in this survey number was sold in a court auction prior to 1971 and therefore, the claim of the Government that the entire land in this survey number belonged to it was not accepted. The writ petition was accordingly disposed of directing the registration authorities to proceed with the registration of documents in respect of this land in accordance with law. Following this order, this Court disposed of WP Nos.19891 of 2013, 25629 of 2013 and 25611 of 2013 with similar directions.

¶11

3. For reasons alike as were mentioned in the aforestated orders passed by this Court, this writ petition is disposed of directing the SubRegistrar, Salur, Vizianagaram District (3^rd respondent), to receive and process the document presented by the petitioner in respect of the subject land. In the event the said document is found to fulfil the requirements of the Registration Act, 1908 and the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, the Sub-Registrar shall complete the registration formalities and release the document in accordance with the due procedure. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶12

Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this writ

¶13

petition shall stand closed.

¶14

____________________________ JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO

¶15

Date: 12.12.2013 kkm

¶16

Oval: 

¶17

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶18

Writ Petition No.36404 OF 2013

¶19

Date: 12-12-2013

¶20

kkm

Sutapalli Gunneshwara Rao, S/o.S.Narsingh Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sutapalli Gunneshwara Rao, S/o.S.Narsingh Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sheetal Pankaj Doshi, Vs The Union of India

Vennapoosa Pulla Reddy, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh

Mohammadia and Co., Vs Saleem Bin Amar Jaidi

Smt. Siddannadala Narayanamma, Vs The Government of Ap

Velpu Vannuru Reddy, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Vangapalli Govind Reddy Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its