The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous and posted for dismissal. No representation was filed by the petitioner, and no costs were awarded.
Petition dismissed; miscellaneous petitions closed; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No. 20329 of 2000
ORDER:
There was no representation for the petitioner on 17.04.2013 and subsequently, on 04.06.2013 the learned counsel for the respondents submitted that petition has become infructuous.
In the above circumstances, the Writ Petition is posted today i.e., 05.06.2013, under the caption ‘for dismissal’.
In spite of posting the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed.
_______________________ B.CHANDRA KUMAR,J
05.06.2013
KKM
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.20329 of 2000
05.06.2013
KKM
Petitioner
Respondents
B. Chandra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
