Pangi Pandurangaswami v. District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner, simultaneously vacating an interim order and disposing of connected petitions as infructuous.
The High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner, simultaneously vacating an interim order and disposing of connected petitions as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.20207 of 2012
Date: 11.09.2013
Between:
Pangi Pandurangaswami
.. Petitioner
and
The District Collector, Visakhapatnam and others
.. Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioner: -- Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3: Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue
Counsel for respondent No.4: Assistant Government Pleader for Social Welfare
Counsel for respondent No.5: Sri V.V.N.Narayana Rao
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief:
“….to issue an order, direction or writ, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring that the inaction of the official respondents in not restraining the 5th respondent in the construction in government land in Sy.No.76D of Paderu Town, Paderu Mandal as unjust, illegal and arbitrary and further direct the respondents 1 to 3 to expedite the process of allotting land to the petitioner for setting up a petty business and to pass such other order or orders……”
Sri Aravind Kumar P.S., learned counsel for the petitioner, addressed a letter dated 10.09.2013 to the Registry, wherein he has informed that his client has instructed him to withdraw the writ petition.
In view of the aforesaid letter, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, interim order dated 04.09.2012 in W.P.M.P.No.25912 of 2012 is vacated and W.P.M.P.No.25912 of 2012 and W.V.M.P.No.3548 of 2012 shall stand disposed of as infructuous.
_____________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J
11th September, 2013 GHN
Pangi Pandurangaswami
The District Collector, Visakhapatnam
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court