Hyderabad, under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for permanent injunction restraining respondent No.2 from disturbing or discontinuing the petitioner from the hotel in question. The petitioner also filed I.A.Nos.4758 and 4759 of 2006 for temporary injunction in the said suit. The said applications were allowed by the learned II Additional Chief Judge subject to the petitioner depositing the lease amount of Rs.17 lakhs per month, pending the arbitration proceedings. The said order was questioned in C.M.A.No.286/2007 & batch by the respondents. This Court, by order dated 1-5-2007 modified the order in the I.As. by enhancing the rent to Rs.25 lakhs per month and furnishing Bank guarantee of Rs.5 lakhs per month, renewable, pending the arbitration proceedings. O.P.No.2498/2006 was eventually disposed of following the order in the above mentioned orders in the C.M.As. Subsequently, a fresh lease was entered between the petitioner and the respondents w.e.f. 10-9-2010 on a monthly lease of Rs.9 lakhs. In the present Writ Petition, refund of the amount paid by the petitioner in excess of Rs.9 lakhs per month is sought on the ground that the said lease amount fixed by the respondents is less than the amount which was deposited by the petitioner in pursuance of the above noted directions issued by the Courts.
