Allowed

Golla Koteswaa Rao, v. The State of A.P.

Telangana HC26 Dec 2013CRLP/15235/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a bail petition under Sections 437 and 439 CrPC sought by accused persons held in judicial custody. It directed their release on a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and obligation to appear before the Investigating Officer weekly.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners ordered released on bail on personal bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties for like amounts; mandatory to report to I.O. every Monday.

Golla Koteswaa Rao, Vs The State of A.P. — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Telangana HC (2013)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD

¶2

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO

¶5

CRL.P.No. 15235 of 2013

¶6

Between:

¶7

1 Golla Koteswaa Rao, S/o. Suribabu,

¶8

2 Janga Kishore, S/o. Dasu, 3 Chakka Ambetkar S/o. Moshe

¶9

Petitioners/Accused Nos. 1 to 3

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of A.P., rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad

¶12

Respondent /Complainant

¶13

COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONERS: SRI. SIVA S. LANKA COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶14

Petition under Sections 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioners / Accused 1 to 3 on bail in connection with Cr.No.149 of 2013 on the file of the Agiripalli P.S., Krishna District

¶15

The Court made the following Order:

¶16

“This criminal petition is filed by the petitioners-Accused Nos. 1 to 3 under Sections 437 and 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking bail in Crime No.149 of 2013 of Agiripalli Police Station, Vijayawada, Krishna District, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 307 and 506 read with 34 of IPC.

¶17

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners- Accused Nos.1 to 3 and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the respondent-state.

¶18

3. Petitioners have been in judicial custody since 22 days. Therefore, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

¶19

Contd..P/2..

¶20

¶21

4. In the result, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the petitioners-accused Nos.1 to 3 are therefore ordered to be released on bail on each of them executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nuzvid, Krishna District. They shall report before the Investigating Officer on every Monday between 9.00 a.m. and 12.00 noon until filing of charge sheet.”

¶22

Sd/-K. BHASKAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶23

//TRUE COPY//

¶24

for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶25

¶26

1. The XV Additional District &Sessions Judge, Krishna at Nuzvid.

¶27

2. The Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nuzvid, Krishna District

¶28

3. The Station House Officer, Agiripalli Police Station, Krishna District.

¶29

4. The Superintendent, Sub Jail, Nuzvid, Krishna District.

¶30

5. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT)

¶31

6. One CC to Sri. Siva S. Lanka, Advocate (OPUC)

¶32

7. One Spare copy

¶33

Note: “Accused Nos. 4 to 8” mentioned in the order dated 26-12-

¶34

2013 in Crl.P.No.15235 of 2013 is corrected as “Accused Nos.1 to 3” and the Section of Law “324” is corrected as “307” as per the order of the Court dated 31-12-2013 made in Crl.P.MP.No.14192 of 2013. Substitute this amended order in place of the previous order which was already despatched on 27-12-2013.”

¶35

Sd/-K. BHASKAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶36

HIGH COURT

¶37

RKRJ

¶38

DT. 26-12-2013 31-12-2013

¶39

AMENDED BAIL ORDER

¶40

CRL.P.NO.15235 OF 2013

¶41

DIRECTION

¶42

Drafted by: KK Drafted on: 26-12-2013

HIGH COURT

RKRJ

DT. 26-12-2013

BAIL ORDER

CRL.P.NO. 15235 OF 2013

¶48

DIRECTION

Golla Koteswaa Rao, v. The State of A.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Golla Koteswaa Rao, v. The State of A.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. v.Nagamani Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Pachipulusu Kameswara Rao Vs State of a.P., rep. by its P.P.

Chintamareddy Murali Reddy Vs The State of Ap

Smt.Vanga Swaroopa Vs The State of Ap.

Talasani Buchi Reddy Vs The State of Andhra PRadesh

Jinka Mohana Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh