In a contempt case, the court allowed the petitioner to make a representation to the respondent regarding his employability due to an amputated leg, and subsequently closed the contempt proceedings.
Contempt proceedings closed; petitioner permitted to make a representation to the respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR
Contempt Case No.2069 of 2013
ORDER:
Sri Sunil Kumar Reddy, learned standing counsel for APSRTC submitted that having regard to the orders of the Hon’ble High Court dated 13.06.2013 in W.P. No.16616 of 2013, the 1st respondent has complied the same by issuing the proceedings No.L4/785(66)/2013-GHZ, dated 27.09.2013. However, learned standing counsel for petitioner submits that there are other posts such as attender, stores assistant etc., admittedly the petitioner’s leg was amputed and it is visible to the naked eye that he cannot be in a position to work as Shramik.
In the above circumstances, the petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the respondent and the respondent shall examine his case sympathetically and pass appropriate orders. Subject to the observation made supra, the Contempt Proceedings are closed.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Contempt Case shall stand closed.
__________________ B.CHANDRA KUMAR, J
30th December, 2013 knl
Sri Sunil Kumar Reddy (Standing Counsel for APSRTC)
Petitioner
1st Respondent
B. CHANDRA KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
