The Court closed a contempt case after the respondent submitted compliance with a prior order. It granted liberty to the petitioner to file a separate application for arrears of wages.
Contempt case closed; liberty granted to file application for arrears of wages.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR
Contempt Case No.1417 of 2013
ORDER:
Learned Standing Counsel for APSRTC submits that the respondent had complied with the order dated 14.06.2013 in W.P.M.P No.20513 of 2013 in W.P. No.16914 of 2013 and issued proceedings No.P2/876(1)/13-TPG, dated 20.12.2013.
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the respondent has not paid wages from the date of passing of the interim order till the date of reinstatement. If that is the case, the petitioner shall file a separate application seeking a direction to respondent for payment of wages for the said period since the writ petition is still pending.
In the circumstances, contempt case is closed giving liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate application for arrears of wages, if any.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Contempt Case shall stand closed.
B.CHANDRA KUMAR, J
30th December, 2013 knl
APSRTC
Petitioner
B. Chandra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
