The appellant failed to appear for hearing on the appeal suit after being directed to be listed for dismissal despite previous default. The court dismissed the suit as per their default order.
The appeal suit is dismissed for default with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
APPEAL SUIT No.2145 OF 1998
JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice L. Narasimha Reddy)
The Appeal Suit was listed ‘for hearing’ yesterday i.e., on 02.07.2013. Since there was no representation for the appellant, it was directed to be listed today ‘for dismissal’. Today also there is no representation for the appellant.
Hence, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs.
The miscellaneous petition filed in the Appeal Suit shall stand disposed of.
____________________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J
________________ S.V. BHATT, J
03.07.2013 KH
L. Narasimha Reddy
S.V. Bhatt
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
