The court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous based on counsel's submission, with no order as to costs.
Petition dismissed as infructuous. WPMP No.939 of 2006 dismissed. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO.786 OF 2006
ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice V.V.S.Rao)
Sri P.Venkata Sai Krishna, representing Sri Palle Nageswar Rao, counsel for the petitioner, submits that the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. WPMP.No.939 of 2006 shall stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
_______________ (V.V.S.RAO, J)
_________________________________ (G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY, J)
2nd April 2012 RRB
Sri Palle Nageswar Rao
Respondent
V.V.S.RAO
G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
