The court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous because the auction was already conducted by the respondent bank before the filing of the petition.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous and the miscellaneous petition stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.8493 OF 2012
March 30, 2012
Between:
P.Gangadhara Prasad, S/o.Balarama Swamy
... Petitioner
And
The Authorised Officer, Indian Bank, Zonal Office, Vijayawada And others
... Respondents
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.8493 OF 2012
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.V.S.Rao)
Mr.B.Kiran Kumar, Advocate, representing Sri K.Vasudeva Reddy, the Counsel for the petitioner, submits that the auction is already conducted by the respondent bank before filing writ petition, and therefore, it has become infructuous. The same is recorded.
The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous. The miscellaneous petition shall stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
_______________ (V.V.S.RAO, J)
________________________________ (G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY, J) March 30, 2012 YS
P.Gangadhara Prasad
The Authorised Officer, Indian Bank, Zonal Office, Vijayawada
V.V.S.RAO
G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
