The Writ Petition was dismissed as infructuous at the instance of the petitioner’s counsel representing the matter in that manner. Consequently, the connected W.P.M.P. also stands dismissed.
The writ petition and the connected W.P.M.P. are dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.6416 of 2007
Date : 22.03.2012
Between :
Datla Venkata Krishnam Raju.
…..Petitioner
And
Inspector of Police, Kakinada town & others.
…..Respondents
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.6416 of 2007
ORDER :
It is represented by the learned counsel for petitioner that the subject matter of writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
In view of dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.8203 of 2007 also stands dismissed.
___________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J
22nd March 2012 ajr
Datla Venkata Krishnam Raju
Inspector of Police, Kakinada town
R. SUBHASH REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
