A writ petition was dismissed by the Single Judge for non-prosecution as the petitioner appeared without any representation, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY
Writ Petition No.20794 of 2006
Date: March 22, 2012
Between:
C. Satyanarayana
… Petitioner
And
The Station House Officer, Pet Basheerabad P.S., Ranga Reddy District and others
… Respondents
Order:
Though the writ petition is listed under the caption ‘old identified matters’ at 2.15 p.m., there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears, the
petitioner is not interested in pursuing the case. In that view of the matter, writ petition is dismissed
for non-prosecution.
______________________ (R. SUBHASH REDDY, J)
March 22, 2012 MRR
C. Satyanarayana
The Station House Officer, Pet Basheerabad P.S., Ranga Reddy District
R. Subhash Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
