Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. The court accorded permission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition accorded; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI
WRIT PETITION No.6360 of 2012
Dated:09.03.2012
Between:
M/s.M.Venkata Subbaiah.
Petitioner
And
State Bank of India.
... Respondent
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI
WRIT PETITION No.6360 of 2012
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.V.S.Rao)
After making submissions for some time, Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.
Permission is accorded, and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
________________
(V.V.S.RAO, J)
09.03.2012
vs
___________________ (NOUSHAD ALI, J)
M/s.M.Venkata Subbaiah
State Bank of India
V.V.S.Rao
Noushad Ali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
