Petitioner sought permission to withdraw a writ petition. The Court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the writ petition accordingly.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted; writ petition and any miscellaneous petitions dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI
WRIT PETITION No.23440 of 2007
Dated:09.03.2012
Between:
M.V.Rama Rao, And another. And The Debts Recovery Tribunal At Chennai, And others.
Petitioners
... Respondents
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI
WRIT PETITION No.23440 of 2007
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.V.S.Rao)
Counsel for the petitioner and the Counsel for the Indian Bank submit that the petitioners are likely to settle the matter with the auction purchaser. Counsel for the petitioner, therefore, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. A letter is also filed in the Registry seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.
Permission is accorded, and the Writ Petition is dismissed
as withdrawn. The miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
________________ (V.V.S.RAO, J)
___________________ (NOUSHAD ALI, J)
09.03.2012 vs
M.V.Rama Rao
Debts Recovery Tribunal At Chennai
V.V.S.Rao
Noushad Ali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
