Writ petition dismissed for nonprosecution as the petitioner failed to appear or make representation before the court on multiple dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY
Writ Petition No.5093 of 2012
Date: July 20, 2012
Between:
Mulam Aravalu
… Petitioner
And
The District Collector, Eluru, West Godavari District and others
… Respondents
Order:
When the matter had come up on 17.07.2012, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. As such, the same is posted today under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears, petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter.
Writ petition is therefore dismissed for nonprosecution.
(R. SUBHASH REDDY, J)
July 20, 2012
MRR
Mulam Aravalu
The District Collector, Eluru
R. SUBHASH REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
