The petitioner failed to appear and did not submit any representation despite advance circulation of the cause list. The court held that the petitioner was not interested and dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.11927 of 2001
Date : 19.07.2012
Between :
All India (Yerukala) Ekalavya Seva Samithi, Nellore District Unit, rep. by its General Secretary.
…..Petitioner
And
District Collector, Nellore & others.
…..Respondents
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.11927 of 2001
ORDER :
Though the writ petition is listed for hearing today, there is no representation on behalf of petitioner. It is also to be noticed that today’s cause-list has been circulated in advance on 17.07.2012 itself. In spite of the same, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. Writ petition is therefore dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J
19th July 2012 ajr
All India (Yerukala) Ekalavya Seva Samithi, Nellore District Unit, rep. by its General Secretary
District Collector, Nellore
others
R. SUBHASH REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
