The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed this writ petition filed by a construction company against the Provident Fund Commissioner as infructuous after the respondents re-deposited the recovered amount into the bank.
The writ petition was dismissed as being infructuous due to the re-deposition of the amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWELVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA
WRIT PETITION No.4808 of 2012
Between: Western Constructions, Hyderabad, rep.by its Partner
..... PETITIONER
AND
The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Hyderabad, and 3 others
.....RESPONDENTS
The Court made the following:
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA
WRIT PETITION No.4808 of 2012
O R D E R:
Sri R.N.Reddy, learned standing counsel for Respondents Nos.1 and 2 submits that this writ petition has been rendered infructuous, as the respondents have already re-deposited the amount that was recovered from the petitioner in the Bank.
In view of the submission made by Sri R.N.Reddy, learned counsel for Respondents Nos.1 and 2, the Writ Petition is dismissed as
having become infructuous.
______________________ ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA,J
Dated: 07.03.2012 Dsr
Western Constructions, Hyderabad
Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Hyderabad
Ashutosh Mhunta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
