Per the petitioner's submission that his matter was rendered infructuous due to the release of his vehicle from permit coverage, this court ordered the writ petition to be closed.
The writ petition was ordered to be closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWELVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA
WRIT PETITION No.23981 of 2009
Between: E.Narasimhulu
PETITIONER
AND The Deputy Transport Commissioner, & Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Anantapur, Anantapur District
.....RESPONDENT
The Court made the following:
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA
WRIT PETITION No.23981 of 2009
O R D E R:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous, because of the vehicle of the petitioner has already been released from the coverage of Permit P.SP.No.9/2001, and hence no further orders are required to be passed.
In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is ordered to be closed. No order as to costs.
______________________ ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA,J
Dated: 05.03.2012 Dsr
E.Narasimhulu
The Deputy Transport Commissioner
Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Anantapur
Ashutosh M. M.
Ashutosh Mohanta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
