A writ petition regarding employment or corporate service was dismissed as infructuous by a single judge bench after counsel submitted that the cause did not survive for adjudication. No costs were awarded.
No costs. Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
Writ Petition No. 16861 of 2000
Dated: 03-12-2012
Between:
M/s Durga Wine Industries, rep. by its Managing Partner M.Ramaiah.
…Petitioner
And
The Asst. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Central Circle, Vijayawada and others.
…Respondents.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
Writ Petition No. 16861 of 2000
Oral order (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram)
It is represented by Sri Y.Koteswara Rao, learned counsel representing Sri Y.Ratnakar, learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Recording the submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
_________________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J
3rd December, 2012
_______________________________ M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, J
GRR
M/s Durga Wine Industries, rep. by M.Ramaiah
The Asst. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Central Circle, Vijayawada and others
GODA RAGHURAM
M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
