The Hon'ble High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 15870 of 2000, holding that it must be rejected in light of the precedent set by N. Swarnalatha.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
Writ Petition Nos. 15870 of 2000
Dated: 29-11-2012
Between: G.Satyanarayana. …Petitioner And The Govt. of India, rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Surface Transport, New Delhi and others.
…Respondents.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
Writ Petition Nos. 15870 of 2000
Common order (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram)
Sri T.Venkataramana, the learned counsel for the petitioner in this writ petition states that the writ petition requires to be dismissed in the light of the judgment of this Court in N.Swarnalatha v. Managing
Director, APSRTC, Hyderabad[1] .
Recording the submission, the writ petition is dismissed. No
costs.
_________________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J
29th November, 2012
_______________________________ M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, J
GRR
[1] 2001(4) ALD 257 (DB)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is maintainable in view of the judgment in N. Swarnalatha vs. Managing Director, APSRTC.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
N. Swarnalatha v. Managing Director, APSRTC, HyderabadFollowed¶9
2001(4) ALD 257 (DB)
G. Satyanarayana
Govt. of India, rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Surface Transport, New Delhi and others
Goda Raghuram
M.S. Ramachandra Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
