The petitioner's counsel stated the writ petition was infructuous. The court recorded this statement and dismissed the writ petition as infructuous without substantive hearing or reasons.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY
Writ Petition No.12583 of 2001
Date: August 2, 2012
Between:
P. Brahmaiah
… Petitioner
And
The District Cooperative Officer, Ongole, Prakasam District and others
… Respondents
Order:
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that no further orders are necessary in this writ petition and the same has become infructuous.
Recording the statement of the learned counsel for the petitioner, writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
R. SUBHASH REDDY, J
August 2, 2012 MRR
P. Brahmaiah
The District Cooperative Officer, Ongole
R. SUBHASH REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
